Skip to content
  • Alsook.nl
  • ToolboxEBP.nl
  • Leeromgeving
Back Home
    • Portal
  • Blog
    • Research
    • PhD project
  • EBP
    • Materialen EBP
    • Databases & journals
    • Meetinstrumenten
  • Training
    • F2F Trainingen
    • Online training
    • Webinars
  • Producten
    • Agenda
    • Peter Hoegen
    • Voorwaarden
    • Tarieven
    • Disclaimer
  • Search
Back Home
  • Search
    • Portal
  • Blog
    • Research
    • PhD project
  • EBP
    • Materialen EBP
    • Databases & journals
    • Meetinstrumenten
  • Training
    • F2F Trainingen
    • Online training
    • Webinars
  • Producten
    • Agenda
    • Peter Hoegen
    • Voorwaarden
    • Tarieven
    • Disclaimer
Home » Blog » PROSPERO registratie
Blog Onderzoek PhD Project PhD research Research Project

PROSPERO registratie

by Peter|Published 22 June 2017-Updated 30 June 2017

Het eerste systematic review (in wording) is geregistreerd bij Prospero: EPB related self-efficacy among health care and social care professionals.

Deel dit:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

  • onderzoek
  • systematic review

You may also like

NTVG: Het verschil tussen retrospectief en prospectief onderzoek?
Published 15 January 2017

NTVG: Het verschil tussen retrospectief en prospectief onderzoek?

Deel dit:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
Published 18 June 2018

Evidence Live Poster presentation

Poster title: Evidence-based practice related self-efficacy among healthcare and social care professionals: a narrative review. https://www.researchgate.net/… All conference abstracts: http://evidencelive.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/POSTER-ABSTRACTS-Evidence-Live-2018-1.pdf Conference website: […]

Deel dit:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
Published 22 September 2015

Critical appraisal of Topics

Kritische beoordeling van wetenschappelijke kennis over voor zorgverlening relevante onderwerpen. Dit artikel is oorspronkelijk gepubliceerd op www.VpkDiarium.nl [opgeheven] op 4 oktober 2013. […]

Deel dit:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
Handige links – Systematic Review
Published 13 October 2016

Handige links – Systematic Review

Over Systematic Reviews Duke University – Systematic Reviews guides.mclibrary.duke.edu Cochrane Handbook handbook.cochrane.org Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) prisma-statement.org, het […]

Deel dit:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

Recente items

  • Nurses’ Perceived Support for Evidence-Based Practice from Leaders and Work Environment.
  • Self-efficacy & Outcome Expectancy in Evidence-Based Practice scales
  • Nurses’ self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in evidence-based practice: Translation, construct validity and internal consistency of the Dutch scales
  • EBP Kennistest: Zo zit het met (onze kennis over) de evidence.
  • Ervaren steun voor EBP van belang voor verpleegkundigen

Post navigation

  • Previous post Research links
  • Back to post list
  • Next post Evidence-based practice boom

© 2003 - 2025 Alsook – Alle rechten voorbehouden (Disclaimer) | Privacy & cookies.